My blog and I have been out of commission for a couple of months. Illness, mostly. All temporary, but when you're really sick, you just think you'll be that way forever. Anyway, enough about that. I'm back, and I'm pushing a film that was trashed by so many--perhaps for reasons that will become obvious.
Julian Jarrold's HBO film The Girl (2012) tells a very old, old story. In this story, a powerful man makes a woman very famous/rich/powerful, but when she ultimately turns down his sexual advances, he punishes/rapes/kills her. The lines of power are very clearly drawn. His power is social, economic, authoritative; hers is sexual. She is beholden to him, or so he thinks. She should be grateful for what he has bestowed upon her. Yet when she's not grateful enough, he destroys her. This tale is a tale of sexual and gender inequality within a rape culture. While this story is told repeatedly, in a myriad of different forms, many people lose their sh** when this story focuses on this guy:
Toby Jones as Alfred Hitchcock in The Girl |
Sienna Miller as Tippi Hedren, framed by Hitchcock in The Girl |
Certainly, the relationship between a director and his star can be deeply intimate and profound, and the film displays the mingled feelings of excitement and trepidation as Hedren begins her work with one of the world's most important and famous film directors. In so many ways, this opportunity is a dream come true for her, one for which she IS grateful to Hitchcock. What begins as a series of small comments and awkward moments evolves into full scale sexual harassment and sadistic abuse. Hedren knows that her career lies in this man's hands. He has the power to make her, and break her. And so he does.
The scenes showing the shooting of the famous final bird attack, the one that breaks the wisecracking Melanie to the point where she is catatonic and fatally quiet, are harrowing to watch.
The film clearly suggests that this elaborately drawn out shoot is Hitch's revenge for her spurning his advances. These scenes are not pretty, and do not show the famous director in a flattering light. He comes off as lecherous, petty, and spiteful. Even the film's more sympathetic moments toward Hitchcock still render him pathetic and small. Hitchcock's eager viewing of that scene's footage is meant to call into question our own pleasures when watching Hedren's abuse unfold. Onscreen, the scene is thrilling; in context, it carries a slightly different edge.
This film is more interested in presenting Hedren's perspective, and the battle for power, and of wills, between her and Hitch. Hedren's dread is palpable as she goes to work, afraid of every private meeting called between them, his every visit to her dressing room. Yet her ego is not unaffected by her new role in the spotlight. She accepts the role of Marnie, despite all that has happened so far. The possibilities are too tempting. The circumstances surrounding that film's shoot make Marnie's rape by her new husband (a marriage born from blackmail), and her attempted suicide in that film, that much more multi-layered.
Not surprising that so many Hitchcock loving film critics (mostly men) are horrified by The Girl, and call it a travesty. The film is one-sided, and not kind to Hitch; it focuses less on his genius and mastery, and more on the pressures women feel from those wielding power in Hollywood.
Hedren has come out for the film, and spoken for its veracity. She has stated that while the film does not capture the fun and humor of her work with Hitchcock, it captures the tensions that existed between them--ones that deeply affected her career. While she can laugh and say that if these things happened today, sexual harassment laws would make her "a very rich woman," I cannot help but think that there are many women working today in Hollywood who suffer similar indignities for the sake of their careers--and they are always poorer for it.